Reply to comment

no censorship here

Hi Mrs. Murdock,

We don't censor posts or comments on this site based on content, if that's what you mean.  Thanks for joining the dialogue.  Could you give some information about what is and is not covered by your policies?

For instance, if a property appears to have no history of confiscation, and is bought at the same time as coverage is bought with one of your policies - but then it is discovered that a portion of the property was written in the Gazette in 1985 as the subject of impending confiscation - but was never legally confiscated in the registry - what would First American do?  If the municipality then simply bulldozed the part of your land in question, builds a storage building, and begins storing machinery there, then what exactly would First American do?  Is there any example yet that shows First American's response in a similar situation.

I think many readers, including myself,  would like to hear about some examples of cases in which First American has and has not paid on  claims, the example I gave being just one of the myriad of types of issues that routinely arise with property in Nicaragua.

Peter Christopher 

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.