Reply to comment

semi-leftist

What I'm hearing is that you're not quite as far left as many.  

The issues of fairness are tough ones.  I agree that all other things being equal, it's ideal for persons to be able to come up with agreements among themselves of any nature.  However, it becomes complicated when one of those persons is an executive representing an institution with resources, and corruption seems to result in many cases... we might characterize the admission of an inferior student based on the contributions of a parent to be theft in that sense.

So, about wealth and freedom of speech, do you think individuals should be able to print leaflets about political candidates or issues?  What if it's only 50 leaflets?  What if it's 50,000,000?  What if a person owns a media station, can they give themself airtime?  How can we draw a line of how one type of free speech is allowed, but another, that might buy political influence, is not?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.