Reply to comment

You wrote "It should be multi

You wrote "It should be multi partisan with members from each party contributing as a team."  and also that it must include a "conflict of interest clause."

It's a nice idea for any culture that has eliminated enough of its problematic elements who would try to take advantage of the situation, but my experience is that the laws are actually not as important as the morality of the people in the first place; a civil group needs few laws, whereas many people cannot be trusted no matter what laws exist.  I'm not sure where that leaves us; we probably both agree that laws are on the whole important, I suppose our only difference I can tell as far as the elections question is that you would favor a more restrictive policy on free speech when it has to do with a political issue, whereas I would be concerned about the abuses of the administrators of such a policy and hold my nose watching disgusting advertisements so long as I don't have to worry about someone censoring me as part of the exchange.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.